Department of Homeland Security Proposes Fair and Humane Public Charge Rule

Department of Homeland Security

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that will regulate how DHS applies the public charge ground of inadmissibility. The proposed rule aims to provide fair and humane treatment for noncitizens requesting admission to the United States or applying for lawful permanent residence from inside the United States. DHS has posted a copy of the proposed rule in advance (https://www.dhs.gov/publication/dhs-proposes-fair-and-humane-public-charge-rule).

In 2019, the prior administration broadened the interpretation of the term “public charge” and the types of public benefits considered. This move caused many noncitizens to be fearful of taking benefits that Congress intended them to have, including noncitizens who are not subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility, such as children in mixed-status households. Now that the 2019 public charge rule is vacated, DHS is undertaking an open and fair rule-making process to enact a new regulation.

Under the proposed rule, DHS proposes to define “likely at any time to become a public charge” as “likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.” Consistent with long-standing agency practice, DHS proposes to consider the following public benefits when making a public charge inadmissibility determination:

  • Supplemental Security Income (SSI); 
  • Cash assistance for income maintenance under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program; 
  • State, Tribal, territorial, and local cash assistance for income maintenance; and 
  • Long-term institutionalization at government expense. 

DHS proposes that it not consider non-cash benefits such as food and nutrition assistance programs including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Children’s Health Insurance Program, most Medicaid benefits (except for long-term institutionalization at government expense), housing benefits, and transportation vouchers. DHS would also not consider disaster assistance received under the Stafford Act; pandemic assistance; benefits received via a tax credit or deduction; or Social Security, government pensions, or other earned benefits.

By law, many categories of noncitizens are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility and would not be subject to the proposed rule. Some of these categories are refugees, asylees, noncitizens applying for or re-registering for temporary protected status (TPS), special immigration juveniles, T and U nonimmigrants, and self-petitioners under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Under the proposed rule, if a noncitizen received public benefits while in an immigration category that is exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, DHS would not consider the noncitizen’s prior receipt of such benefits as part of any future public charge determination.

Source: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2022/02/17/dhs-proposes-fair-and-humane-public-charge-rule

Categories: 
Related Posts
  • Future of DACA in Doubt Read More
  • DHS and DOS Announce Exemptions Allowing Eligible Afghans to Qualify for Protection and Immigration Benefits Read More
  • Uniting for Ukraine, a New Streamlined Process to Welcome Ukrainians Fleeing Russia's Invasion of Ukraine Read More
/